In Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission and others, 1982 TAX.L.R. 2590, wherein the notice issued under sub-clause (iv) of clause (a) of section 10 of the MRTP Act was in question, it was observed by the Bombay High Court as under :- "10.
You've already forked sbm 0 Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Hence the cause title has been directed to be amended to show the above name. Of the 4 appeals 3 relate to M/s. VXL India Ltd. and the other to M/s. Oriental Carpet Manufacturers (India) Ltd. 2. M/s. Shri Digvijay Woollen Mills Ltd. filed classification list claiming exemption under notification No. 198/76-CE dated 16-6-1976 and in that ...
Sen has strenuously urged that while as per the agreement-in-question it was Raymond Cement Works on whose behalf the Cement Manufacturers' Association had entered into the contract with his client i. e. the respondent-CIL, the present appellant …
Today, Raymond's covers textiles, apparel, FMCG products and engineering. The company's turnover in 2018-19 was more than ₹6,500 crore, of which branded textiles accounted for about 46 per cent and branded apparel for 24 per cent. It exports its products to more than 55 countries globally and is one of the leaders in the denim space.
Supreme Court of India. Shramik Uttarsh Sabha vs Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. & Ors on 7 February, 1995. Equivalent citations: 1995 AIR 1137, 1995 SCC (3) 78. Author: B S.P. ... The first respondent is a public limited company with an industrial establishment at Bombay. It is covered by the provisions of the B.I.R. Act.
Contribute to sbmcrushers/sbmchina development by creating an account on GitHub.
6. It was also pointed out to the parties that the issue of consideration of various duty for valuation of the closing stock was the subject matter of difference of opinion between the two Members and the same came to be resolved by the Third Member which was in the case of Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. ITO [1986] 18 ITD 64
The learned Counsel for the appellant would contend that a later decision of the Bombay High Court in Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. Union of India - 1992 (57) E.L.T. 396 (Bom.) took the view that assessee will be entitled to abatement in respect of commission payable to the commission agents. It is urged before us by the learned Counsel that ...
This is so because the formation of belief by the AO is within the realm of subjective satisfaction ITO v. Selected Dalurband Coal Co, (P.) Ltd. (1996 ... Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. ITO (1999) 236 ITR 34 (Supreme Court)." 13. The above discussion and precedent from Apex Court fully justify the validity of reopening in this case. 8.
Manoj Metals escapement is not the concern at that stage. This is so because the formation of belief by the AO is within the realm of subjective satisfaction ITO v. Selected Dalurband Coal Co, (P.) Ltd. (1996) 217 ITR 597 (Supreme Court): Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. ITO (1999) 236 ITR 34 (Supreme Court). 10.
Contribute to kokiulinjsb/ru development by creating an account on GitHub.
Selected Dalurband Coal Co. Pvt. Ltd.: [1996] 217 ITR 597 ... Shramik Utkarsha Sabha v. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. reported in 1995 (1) ... Hon'ble Bombay High Court in case of Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, reported in (Bom.) has also taken the same view.
Raymond Share Price: Find the latest news on Raymond Stock Price. Get all the information on Raymond with historic price charts for NSE / BSE. Experts & Broker view also get the Raymond Ltd. buy ...
Ltd. (1996) 217 ITR 597 (Supreme Court): Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. ITO (1999) 236 ITR 34 (Supreme Court)." 9. Therefore, after considering the facts of the present case, we are of the considered view that the information received from the Govt. Deptt was sufficient to make a belief regarding escapement of income by the AO.
Bench: T Chatterjee, D Bhandari. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment/order dated 12.10.2000 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") in R.T.P. Enquiry No. 204 of 1988. 2. Brief …
Instructions issued by Coal India Ltd., Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. etc. Clause 7 is set out hereinbelow for ready reference "7. The sale order will be governed by guidelines – circulars – office orders – notices – instructions, relevant law etc. issued from time to time by Coal India Ltd., Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., State
Income-Tax Officer, Calcutta vs M/S. Selected Dalurband Coal Co. ... on 29 March, 1995. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. vs Income-Tax Officer on 31 March, 1986. Citedby 0 docs Atlas Castalloy Ltd, Mumbai vs Acit Cir 6(1) (2), Mumbai on 25 May, 2022. Warning on Translation. Try out ...
Appeal: Civil Appeal No. 4126 of 1991. Petitioner: Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Respondent: M.R.T.P. Commission & Anr. Apeal: Civil Appeal No. 4126 of 1991. Judges: KULDIP SINGH & S. MOHAN, JJ. Date of Judgment: Feb 26, 1993.
2. Upon a dispute having arisen with regard to the quality of supply of coal and the co-related payment/refund of the price thereof, the appellant-purchaser, Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd., moved an application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to enforce the arbitration clause of an agreement. This was objected to by the respondent ...
Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. Coal India Ltd. & Anr. S. Narayan, J.:— For an easy and early resolve of a dispute arising out of a commercial deal, it is now mostly preferred to go for an arbitration proceeding, of course, only in the failure by way of …
Bench: T Chatterjee, D Bhandari. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment/order dated 12.10.2000 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") in R.T.P. Enquiry No. 204 of 1988. 2. Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are as under: A Notice of ...
Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. vs Income-Tax Officer on 31 March, 1986. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872. ... Nos. 4 7 & 4 8/ Mu m/ 2 0 18 Mircon Infrastructure Private Limited There is a list of such parties wherein the assessee is stated to be beneficiary of bogus purchase bills. ... Selected Dalurband Coal Co, (P.) Ltd. (1996) 217 ITR 597 ...
Selected Dalurband Coal Co, (P.) Ltd. (1996) 217 ITR 597 (Supreme Court): Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. ITO (1999) 236 ITR 34 (Supreme Court)." 12. The above discussion and precedent from Apex Court fully justify the validity of reopening in this case. Further I find that the Ld. CIT(A) has carefully examined the issue and has properly ...
Raymond Woollen Mills (Kenya) ltd., later known as Heritage Woollen Mills ltd., was set up in Eldoret in order to manufacture hand-knitting yarn, knitwear as well as knitted fabrics, blankets and ...
